Unilateral Preferences: Erosion and Expiration
|
|
Since the late 1960s, unilateral preferential schemes, such as the Caribbean Basin Initiative (CBI), CARIBCAN, the
Generalised System of Preferences (GSP), and the
Lomé Convention and Cotonou Agreement preferences
have provided reduced or zero tariff rates over the most favoured nation (MFN) rates for certain products
originating from the Caribbean and other developing countries.
Preferential agreements, however, are evolving and liberalisation at the multilateral level, through WTO
negotiating rounds, as well as through regional trade agreements, threatens to erode the value of preferential
access. Trade preference dependent countries are increasingly challenged to enhance their competitiveness in order
to still benefit under a more liberalised multilateral trading system.
Articles on the Erosion of Preferences
Preference-Dependent Economies & Multilateral Liberalisation: Impact and Options

Commonwealth Secretariat
Trade Preferences for LDCs: An Early Assessment of Benefits and Possible Improvements

UNCTAD
A book published by the World Bank and Palgrave MacMillan in early 2009 reviews the current “value” of preferences
for beneficiary countries in major OECD markets, assesses the implications of preference erosion under different
global liberalization scenarios, and discuss potential policy responses. This work was organized by The World Bank
in cooperation with OECD and the WTO and with support from the Canadian International Development Agency and the
UK Department for International Development. The papers listed below are the preliminary versions of the book
chapters:
-
Quantifying the Value of Preferences and Potential Erosion Losses
, Bernard Hoekman, William J. Martin and
Carlos A. Primo Braga
-
Quantifying the Value of U.S. Tariff Preferences for Developing Countries
, Judith M. Dean and John Wainio
-
What Are EU Trade Preferences Worth for Sub-Saharan Africa and Other Developing Countries?
- Fabien Candau and
Sébastien Jean
-
Japan's Generalized System of Preferences
, Norio Komuro
-
The Canadian Preferential Tariff Regime and Potential Economic Impracts of its Erosion
, Przemyslaw
Kowalski
-
The Australian Preferential Tariff Regime
, Douglas Lippoldt
-
Multilateral Solutions to the Erosion of Non-Reciprocal Preferences in NAMA
, Patrick Low, Roberta Piermartini and Jurgen Richtering
-
Non-Reciprocal Preference Erosion Arising From MFN Liberalitzation in Agriculture: What Are the Risks?
-
Patrick Low, Roberta Piermartini and Jurgen Richtering
-
The Doha Development Agenda and Preference Erosion: Modeling the Impacts
, Dominique van der Mensbrugghe
-
Trade Preferences for Apparel and the Role of Rules of Origin - The Case of Africa
, Paul Brenton and Çaglar Özden
-
Economic Policy Responses to Preference Erosion: From Trade as Aid to Aid for Trade
, Bernard Hoekman and Susan Prowse
For more information, click here.
|
|
Focus on the Americas
|
|
Efforts at closer economic integration with Latin American countries began in the early 1990s as CARICOM countries
explored alternatives to traditional trade relationships based on eroding preferences. In the early stages, CARICOM
reached trade agreements with Colombia and Venezuela—agreements that were to begin as preferential agreements that
gradually evolved towards reciprocity in the case of the agreement with Colombia - and participated in the creation
of the Association of the Caribbean States (ACS).
In the second half of the 1990s, CARICOM fully engaged itself in trade talks with other hemispheric partners. In
their 16th meeting, held in Guyana in July 1995, the CARICOM Heads of Government agreed to give priority to
negotiating trade agreements with Latin American countries. CARICOM subsequently negotiated bilateral free trade
agreements with the Dominican Republic (1998), Cuba (2000), and Costa Rica (2004), while actively participating in
the now dormant hemispheric Free Trade Area of the Americas (FTAA) process from 1995 to 2004. As a result, CARICOM's
trade with its hemispheric partners has significantly increased during the 1990s. For more information on CARICOM
trade with the Americas and the rest of the world,
click here.
|
|